The goal of this project is to prove the third component of Global Alternative Investments' critical economic model. This will involve several different steps for the students, including:

- Analyzing existing data related to the economic model.

- Developing a proof of the third component of the model.

- Testing the proof and making improvements based on additional data.

- Researching other variables that can improve the proof.

- Accounting for additional variables in the proof.

The 3rd component of the formula will be an equation that proves its already known answer (component #2), which is derived from one or more economic inputs. In fact, the 3rd component’s equation would itself prove the formula’s 2nd component (supplied post-NDA). This even suggests independence from the 3rd-party’s research which proves the formula’s 2nd component.

While the employer is wholly satisfied that the formula's principal economic indicator is known, the task at-hand is to illustrate that the 3rd component’s equation produces the 3-part formula in a manner which proves prevention of either hyperinflation or deflation at any point in the future. The entirety of the preceding pertains to the interest charges paid within the economy in question, including the interest charges paid by government to its foreign bondholders.

By the end of the project, students should demonstrate:

- Understanding of the existing data related to the economic model.

- Understanding of variables that affect the proof of the third component.

- Identification of areas for future improvement of the proof.

Bonus steps would include:

- Testing the proof with other experts and accounting for additional parameters.

Final deliverables should include

- A written report explaining the design process and outcomes.

I will guide parties according to my extensive knowledge developed over 41 years. I will explain how I came to learn of the first 2 components of the formula for which the 3rd component is to be developed.

While the latter is the purpose of this project, I will teach why I believe I have the starting point for developing or identifying the 3rd component. In the best case scenario, my hypothesis regarding the missing component is correct, and it would merely be a matter of proving it within the context of the formula.

Whether one or more variables are required with respect to the 3rd component, I will guide the process in the same manner that I developed a rules-based investment strategy using the mathematical work of a CFA. I guided the changes in the variables until the formula became viable (in this case, the CFA's sole knowledge pertained to how to input mathematical variables provided to him).